Contact us here at 3Dkids
 
 
Join the 3DKids blog today

30 October 2008

Pupils’ take-away lunch warning

Pupils should be kept in school grounds during lunch breaks to stop them eating unhealthy take-away food, the Schools Secretary Ed Balls has said.

Mr Balls says there is little point in banning junk food inside school, if pupils then eat it outside school.

This will not be a compulsory requirement, but Mr Balls says he will back heads trying to impose a policy of not allowing pupils out during the day.

He also wants councils to limit the number of take-aways near schools.

Mr Balls is set to address the Healthy Eating in Schools Conference in London - where he will claim that "the corner has been turned" on improving the quality of school meals.

Unhealthy eating

Since the Jamie Oliver-inspired campaign to improve school food, there has been a series of initiatives, costing £650m, designed to raise the nutritional content and appeal of school meals.

 

But Mr Balls will tell the conference that attention needs to be paid to what children are eating outside school.

"There is no point in banning junk food and raising the quality of lunches in schools, if teenagers can simply go to eat unhealthy food from neighbouring take-aways," says Mr Balls.

As such, he says he supports "stay-on site" policies, in which pupils are not allowed to leave school premises during the day - stopping them from eating in local fast-food shops.

This will help to tackle an "ingrained culture of unhealthy eating", he says.

Mr Balls also backs local authority efforts to limit access to fast food - such as imposing a ban on take-aways within 400 metres of secondary school gates.

A survey of secondary school pupil eating habits published this summer found that 80% of pupils bought food from local shops.

The research by the Nutrition Policy Unit of London Metropolitan University found that two in five pupils never used the school canteen.

An important factor in eating habits was the speed and convenience of getting food from local take-aways, rather than queuing and overcrowding in school canteens, found researchers.

Rather than the quality or cost of school food being the determining factors, it was often the lack of comfort in the school canteen that influenced pupils.

The study found that local shops were more entrepreneurial about meeting this demand - offering cut-price child-size portions and getting in extra staff so that children could be served quickly.

However, this meant that children were ignoring healthy food in school and buying food and drink with high levels of fat and sugar.

A survey from the NHS Information Centre earlier this year found that one in three 11-year-olds is overweight or obese.

The source of this Article is from the BBC

Relevant Tags

Category -
Education, News , , , , , , , , ,

End of Article

24 October 2008

Compulsory Lessons about personal, social and health matters including sex.

Lessons about personal, social and health matters including sex and relationships will be compulsory in all England’s schools from ages five to 16.

But the government is setting up a review of how best to achieve this, saying there are "complicated issues".

Schools Minister Jim Knight said this would factor in the ethos of schools, pupils’ needs and parents’ values.

A BBC poll of more than 1,000 people found two thirds would support sex lessons from the age of 11.

Reviews of education about sex and relationships and about drugs and alcohol were ordered after ministers said teaching was "patchy".

What they have not yet given is the detail of what compulsory personal, social and health education (PSHE) will involve, to allow local flexibility.

 

The Department for Children, Schools and Families said the review of sex lessons had identified "a need to challenge the perception that sex and relationships education happened in a ‘moral vacuum’ in schools and says that parents and schools can and should work together to decide how best topics should be taught."

It said updated guidance would also be produced covering the content of the PSHE curriculum, based on the existing non-statutory programme.

Lessons should be "age appropriate". In primary schools, Sir Jim Rose would look at how PSHE should best be delivered as part of his ongoing review of the curriculum.

The new review of how to make PSHE compulsory will be led by a London head teacher, Sir Alasdair MacDonald.

Mr Knight told BBC News: "We are not suggesting that five and six-year-olds should be taught sex.

"What we are saying is we need to improve in particular the relationship education, improve the moral framework and moral understanding around which we then talk about sex later on in a child’s education."

‘Brilliant’

He said what schools would have to follow would be a high-level "programme of study". But it would still be up to schools to decide what to teach.

"Faith groups for example will want to produce supplementary guidance on top of our guidance, in order to say to their own schools … how they should then deliver that programme of study in a way that’s sympathetic to their moral beliefs, their faith beliefs in those schools."

The Catholic Education Service for England and Wales said it supported the priority given to establishing a "values context" for all sex and relationships teaching, the recognition of the importance of the role of parents, and the clear expectation that lessons would be shaped by Catholic teaching.

The chief executive of the sexual health charity Brook, Simon Blake, said the news that PSHE was to be a statutory part of the national curriculum was "absolutely brilliant".

He added: "Now, at last, we can put the systems in place to give teachers and others the training and support they need to work effectively in partnership with children, young people and their parents."

   

The head of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), John Dunford, has written to the government complaining that secondary schools have only just begun implementing major changes to the curriculum including highly regarded but non-statutory material on PSHE.

"In ASCL’s view it would be extremely detrimental to make PSHE compulsory or to change the revised secondary curriculum orders in any way at this point," he wrote.

It was not just a subject on the timetable.

"It is part of the ethos of the school, helping to develop the young person in ways that schools deem most appropriate to their circumstances.

"It should not be the subject to further central prescription and certainly not compulsion."

Consultation

The sex education teaching requirements placed on schools at present are limited.

In primary schools, sex education is covered as part of the science curriculum.

This tells children about the main body parts and explains that reproduction is one of the life processes common to all animals including humans.

In secondary school, again mainly through science lessons, children cover the human reproductive cycle, including adolescence, fertilisation and foetal development.

 

They may also learn - though there is no statutory requirement that they should - about relationship skills, rights and responsibilities and different types of relationships, contraception, pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections and risky behaviours.

In Wales, sex and relationship education is already part of the curriculum and it is a legal requirement in Northern Ireland.

There is no legal requirement in Scotland.

The UK Youth Parliament says four out of 10 young people say they received no relationship education at school.

Earlier this year, figures were released showing that the number of abortions performed in the UK on girls under 16 had risen by 10% in 2007.

A UK-wide poll commissioned by the BBC from NOP found that the majority of those questioned believed sex and relationship lessons should be compulsory in schools.

Of those, 64% believed lessons should not start until children are at least 11 years old.

Just over a third (36%) said they did not think children should learn about contraception until they were at least 13.

Relevant Tags

Category -
Education, News, Nursery News , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

End of Article

3 October 2008

School trips ‘not optional extra’

Pupils must not be denied school trips because teachers fear being sued if things go wrong, says the government.

The government’s new £4.5m Out and About scheme gives schools in England clearer advice on safe outings.

Schools Secretary Ed Balls said children should not be wrapped up in cotton wool.

The initiative comes as the schools watchdog, Ofsted, reports that outings boost achievement but that many schools do not see trips as a priority.

England’s Ofsted inspectors said trips enhanced learning and motivated pupils.

The watchdog visited 27 schools and found activities such as trips to museums, visits to historical landmarks in foreign countries, after-hours sports and music clubs all increased pupils’ involvement, enjoyment and achievement.

   

Even conducting a science class in the school field had a positive impact, they found.

"Where young people experience memorable events in their education, they don’t just remember the emotion and excitement of the event itself but the learning that went with it," the report said.

Chief inspector Christine Gilbert said: "The positive impact of learning outside the classroom is widely recognised, but unfortunately it is sometimes seen as an extra or a treat, rather than as an integral part of the curriculum.

"Many schools will find the examples highlighted in the report extremely useful."

Vivid memories

The government’s Out and About scheme aims to give schools in England much clearer information to help organise effective learning outside the classroom.

The package, which has received £4.5m funding, will indentify organisations that provide high quality and safe outings for schools.

Schools Secretary Ed Balls said it was wrong to wrap children in cotton wool as they grew up.

"Trips and getting out of the classroom should be part and parcel of school life and always give the most vivid childhood memories," said Mr Balls.

"Learning outside the classroom is not some optional extra. It should excite young people, deepen their understanding of classroom subjects and are a vital to make young people independent, confident and self-reliant.

"The vast majority of England’s eight million children go safely on school trips or learn outside the classroom at some stage. But we know that more can be done to make sure it is an integral part of every child’s education.

"It is time that the fear of compensation culture is consigned to history once and for all."

Union support

The NASUWT union said it supported the plans.

"The perception of the classroom as the only space for learning needs to be challenged and we are excited to see there is such a positive direction of travel on this agenda as part of the Children’s Plan," said general secretary Chris Keates.

The National Union of Head Teachers gave its "full endorsement" to the programme.

"With all learning outside the classroom activities, we will need to be confident that all health and safety aspects are secure but non-bureaucratic," said general secretary Mick Brookes.

 

Relevant Tags

Category -
Education, News , , , , , , , ,

End of Article